Comments from 2002
CommentsMy truck is a 2001 Silverado with an automatic transmission and a V-8 engine. It is a 70-mile road trip mostly on interstate highway for me to get to work daily. I used 1 oz. of Gas Kicker for every 10 gallons of gas, and I only use it every other fill-up. Since I started using Gas Kicker I have increased my mileage by 9% and the engine seems to have more power. I highly recommend Gas Kicker. I'm sure that my truck will have a longer life because of this product.
Name:
CommentsHey guys! I screwed up and didn't link your comments to our guest book. That is why anyone who left a comment after 12/31/01 did not get it recorded. Sorry, but now it is fixed 2/28/02. Looking forward to hearing your comments again. Thanks Don
Commentshey, that was one of my messages that got lost. :-) it's ok, all i said was "Your product works GREAT! keep up the good work. LP
CommentsRXP has got my 82 mustang GT running smooth again. thanks for a great product that works like it says it does.
CommentsThis comment was posted from an e-mail to Dean Johnson: Dear Mr. Johnson: Just wanted to relate to you my experience using your product, RxP, on a 1984 Ford Thunderbird with about 95,000 miles. I am in Phoenix Arizona and they require an emissions test every two years. I am told it is the most demanding emissions test in the US. Nothing like Washington State where I had lived previously. After about 11 tries through the emissions test and changing all parts (wires, plugs, rotor, rotor cap, air filter, etc.) I had dropped the emissions to about double the allowed amount, but could go no lower. I asked in the auto parts store what they recommended and they told me about your RxP product. I thought their claims were exaggerated, that is until I used your product. After about 2.5 tanks with the directed gas/RxP mix. I took the emissions test and passed. But what I also noticed was the car did not overheat as before, pinging stopped, the power curve was improved, gas milage improved about 17%, and it was much quiter and idled better. Really like a new car. So, I went to your Web site and read about your development. Was especially impressed with the RxP's ablility to convert energy from radient to kinetic. Since my car is not overheating, and has lots more power I know this is exactly what is happening. I plan on using the product on a regular basis. Contrary to what was told to me in the auto parts store, regular use would be the best way to go. They had recommended using it for only one tank to pass the emissions test. In Phoenix, however, any product that can reduce engine temperature and increase performance will immediately pay for itself. I think your comments about being able to change the dynamics of the combustion process to increase fuel economy while reducing emissions is extremely important. You indicate you have independent data veryifying your claims. I am convinced, based on my own experience. But, why don't you generate more data and present and promote it? Have you considered doing a large scale field test in a desert enviroment? What effect would it have on air conditioning systems and their longevity? I know about overcoming "conventional wisdom" with a new product, or relatively new product. When they tell you no it won't really work. I have 6 US Patents for cushioned flooring systems. I installed a full size basketball floor with a material composition of rubber and urethane, plus recycled sneakers. When we were done the floor looked (after painting it) just like a wood basketball floor. And the ball bounce was the same, but the athlete's performance was enhanced. Had NIST and EPA grants to prove player fatigue and was reduced and performance enhanced. Five pro teams did full practice on surface and 3 gave written evaluations, verifying player evaluations paralled fatigue testing performed by the University of Michigan. My point, about 40% of bioengineers refused to believe until looking at data that a surface could absorb so much shock, yet enhance performance. But they were wrong. The product cost 4X that of a traditional wood floor so I failed to commercialize the technology, but nevertheless it did perform contrary to predictions by the experts. Perhaps, you are running into the same problem. Since your claims make the product appear to be an overly convenient answer to global warming and a fossil fuel shortage, not many listen when they should. On the basketball floor project (above paragraph) I worked extensively with 5 mechanical engineers, all from University of Wisconsin, all with their masters and all having at least 10 years experience in automotive design. Two of them lead product design groups; one for suspension systems for race cars, the other for diesel engines. I am going to send an e-mail regarding your product and my notes to one of them. Will be very interested in his evaluation of the potential for your RxP product in diesel engines, especially with direct injection diesel engines. The RxP really worked for me as promised. With all due respect, you really should promote it more and get more independent data. Your technology, appears to be much more important than just a way to make money. It looks more like a strategic technology that would could be an important component in the US energy security policy. Anyway, two thumbs up. You have done an excellent product development job. Take care. Tom Vaux
CommentsI drive a VW Jetta diesel with over 391,000 miles on the odometer, and it has become increasingly more difficult to find # 2 fuel with enough cetane rating for a naturally aspirated engine with Ricardo type swirl combustion chambers to run without excessive exhaust smoke under heavy load. RxP allows this engine to perform at its power rating without smoke as well as better starts. It also cleans out quicker after a cold start - with less combustion noise, runs smoother as it warms up (no stumbling), which permits shorter shifting (saving fuel) and the over all drivability is improved. It pulls smoothly from 30 mph in 5th gear (the normal low limit is usually 35 to 40 mph). This a good product that has a permanent place in my trunk. Yours Truly: Bill W. Name: Bruce Hammer Date: Time: 9:00 A.M. This comment was posted from a letter to Dean
Johnson Comments
Hi
Dean, Name:
CommentsI have a '91 Ford Explorer 4x4, it failed the emission test... Oxide of Nitrogen was too high. I did some research, stumbled upon this website and Texas Department of Transportation website. I put two and two together and realized RxP will take care of it. Good enough, my SUV passed the emissions! It was only an hour after I put in RxP and filled up full of Texaco's Cleansystem gasoline. Thank you for being a big help, and a worthy testimontial to your wondrous life-saver! Love this for helping lessen air pollution, too...
CommentsMy wife's 86 Olds seemed like it took too long to crank, mechanic said didn't need a tune up. Started a lot better after just 1 bottle and now add about every 6 mo. I couldn't beleive the difference.Great product!
CommentsJust browsing and this looked interesting. The Rubber/Wood.
CommentsExcellent product - apparent after 50 miles in the tank! Turned my coughing Astro van into a purring kitten. After half a tank it tested well down the graph in the new, tougher emmisions test required in larger Texas metro areas. I have tried several other "fuel systems" cleaners without results. RxP worked so well I bough another bottle to have on hand. Auto Zone in this area (chaecked three stores) does NOT seem to carry the product but Wal-Mart does. Again, a GREAT product and a very interesting web site.
CommentsThank you for the resources. Keep up the good work!
CommentsMy truck is a '90 Dodge Dakota V-6 3.9 with 120700 miles. Every time emissions test time comes around I start sweating. For the last 5 yrs it has cost me anywhere from $100 to $500 for what could have been unnecessary emissions repairs. I took my truck in for the test and once again it failed. The person who did the testing recommended having my injectors cleaned.The Co reading was 2.60 and the limit is 1.20. I decided to first look for a gas additive that cleans injectors. I found RXP on the shelf in Wal Mart. It was the only bottle left so I figured it must be good. I followed the directions and on my way to take the retest I hit the highway. I went about 40 miles at 70 to 75 mph and then straight to the testing station. As I sat sweating bullets my truck was passing the test with flying colors. The Co reading now scored .15 instead of 2.60. Your product is definitely a godsend. I thank you guys for being a lifesaver. I will continue to use your product and recommend it to all.
CommentsHi,I own a 2002 f 250 ford superduty with the power stroke diesel.I took delevery on this truck on sept 26,2001,I now have 32,000 miles on it.The truck I had before was a 1994 f350 with the power stroke diesel that had 140,000 miles on it when I sold it.It was still getting between 22 to 26 mpg. The new truck with the same specs and running gear only gets between 16 and 18 mpg. Will your product help me get better milage??????? All that I do is highway driving each day. Thank you John Shea Yes, RxP will certainly help. For more specific information why don't you e-mail our tech. Go to E-mail List. Thanks
CommentsAfter my car failed the emission test (had CO emission of .9 when the limit is .89) I was not going to spend a lot of money and time into repairing any engine parts. I was told about this product and after I've ran a full tank of gas with it, I took the emission test again and now I was down to .3! Excellent performance. I would really recommend this product to anyone who wants to both improve engine performance or simply reduce emissions.
CommentsYour product was GREAT!! After (barely) failing emmisions 3 times I used your product and passed! Thanks, Jodi Bowman
CommentsThe following is an email I sent out to family and friends regarding this product: I don't usually promote products, but I recently stepped upon a little jewel that might help those of us that live in areas that require vehicle emission tests. This past Thursday night I failed my low speed emission tests horribly. One of the technicians at the inspection center said he put some stuff called "RXP" in my gas tank and to come back in a couple of days. Well, I only had about a quarter tank of gas left so I wasn't sure how much he put in there. So, the next day, I went down to AutoZone and bought another bottle - around $6. After filling my tank up with super unleaded, I put this miraculous substance in my full tank. I then drove around normal for about a day or so. This morning I took the LONG way around and drove about 30 minutes at highway speeds before heading back to the service station for a reinspection in hopes that RXP would burn off a little more of the "bad stuff". Needless to say, I passed with flying colors this time. The night I failed the test, I had my oil and oil filter changed right before the test - probably a mistake doing it then. I probably should have done it a few days prior. Last night, I changed my air filter. Just to give you an idea of what the numbers were before and after.... This is for the low speed emission test: Before: Standard Current Reading Result HC (ppm) 194 226 FAIL CO (%) 1.74 <can't recall> PASS NOx (ppm) 1340 2178 FAIL
After: Standard Current Reading Result HC (ppm) 194 59 PASS CO (%) 1.74 .18 PASS NOx (ppm) 1340 739 PASS HC dropped 73.8% NOx dropped 66% I feel what made the most difference was the RXP - especially after reading other's testimonials at www.rxp.com. So, if you want to pass, do the following: Change the oil and oil filter (if needed) Change the air filter (if needed) Fill the tank up and put a bottle of RXP in it. Drive for a couple of days to burn off the carbon and other "bad stuff". Before the test, drive for 30 minutes or so at highway speeds (not sure if this part is required...I did it and I passed).
Anyway... I thought you all might like to know this especially if your area requires emission tests.
As always, regards.... Adam
CommentsI have a 1991 gmc pickup. I had emissin problems with the HC's and NOX. i added a 2.5 oz bottle of RXP to the gas tank and filled the tank with premiun gas. Then i drove the vehicle 250 miles at highway speeds. when i had the emissions tested again,the HC's were reduced by 38% and the NOX (ppm) was reduced by 36%. That RXP is great stuff. I will be an advertizer for RXp from now on. I WILL BE ADDING A BOTTLE OF rxp TO EVERY FOURTH TANK OF GAS FROM NOW ON. tHANKS rxp. SINCERELY, JIM JORDAN
|
|
|